Análisis de factores de agresividad de microcarcinoma papilar de tiroides / Features influencing aggressiveness of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

Background: the risk factors determining the aggressiveness of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) are not well known. Aim: to determine if tumor size, along with other features of the tumor, influences its prognosis. Patients and Methods: we analyzed the medical records of 147 patients (age range 16-92 years, 93 percent women) at the Clinical Hospital of University of Chile who underwent thyroid surgery and in whom at least one focus of PTMC was found. We determined the association between different clinical characteristics and the presence of capsular invasion, lymph nodal extension or recurrence. Results: a tumor size over 5 mm, a follicular subtype and being aged more than 45 years, were significantly associated with the presence of capsular invasion. The latter two variables were protective. In the multivariate analysis, only a tumor size over 5 mm was significantly associated with thyroid capsule involvement. Conclusions: a tumor size over 5 mm is associated with capsular invasion in PTMC.

Introducción: los factores de riesgo que determinan una conducta agresiva de microcarcinoma papilar de tiroides (MCPT) no se conocen. Nuestra hipótesis es que el tamaño del tumor, posiblemente junto con otras características del cáncer puede influir en el pronóstico de esta patología. Material y Método: se analizaron las historias clínicas de 147 pacientes que se sometieron en nuestro hospital a cirugía de tiroides y en los cuales se encontró al menos un foco de MCPT. Resultados: se determinó la existencia de una correlación entre las diferentes características clínicas y la presencia de invasión capsular, la extensión ganglionar linfático o la recidiva. En el análisis univariado, el tamaño del tumor mayor de 5 mm, se correlacionó significativamente con la presencia de invasión capsular (p < 0,05). Entre las variables estudiadas, sólo un tamaño superior a 5 mm se asoció significativamente con el compromiso de la cápsula tiroidea en el análisis multivariado. Conclusiones: aunque en general el MCPT se comportan con baja agresividad, se encontró que aquellos que son mayores de 5 mm a menudo tienen invasión capsular, que se ha relacionado con aumento de la agresividad y recidiva. Se recomienda un tratamiento orientado según la presencia de factores de riesgo como las que se describen aquí.

Detección inmunohistoquímica de parafibromina en patología de paratiroides / Immunohistochemical detection of parafibromin in parathyroid pathology

Introduction: The definitive diagnosis of parathyroid cancer is extremely difficult, from the clinical approach to the molecular diagnosis. A gene mutation was detected recently in patients with parathyroid cancer. It is a suppressor tumor gene called HRPT2, which codifies for a protein that participates in PAF1 complex, the parafibromin. It has been observed that the expression of this protein it's altered in parathyroid cancer, what would serve like method of diagnosis by immunohystochemistry, with a sensitivity and specificity of 73-96 percent and 99-100 percent respectively. Material and Method: The anti-parafibromin immunohysto-chemistry staining was made in 23 parathyroids tissue samples (5 adenomas, 6 hyperplasia, 7 normal and 5 carcinomas). Results: A positive pattern is observed in almost 100 percent of benign pathology and 100 percent in normal tissue. In the cases of carcinoma only 2 of 5 had a strong positivity. Conclusions: The pathological clinical correlation does not allow the association of the loss of parafibromin immunoreactivity in some unequivocal cases of parathyroid cancer. The parafibromin immunostaining does not allow to discriminate between benign or malign pathologies.

Introducción: El diagnóstico definitivo de cáncer de paratiroides es extremadamente difícil, desde el acercamiento clínico hasta el diagnóstico molecular. Se detectó recientemente en pacientes con cáncer de paratirodes un gen supresor de tumor mutado (HRPT2), que codifica para una proteína que participa en el complejo PAF1, la parafibromina. Se ha observado que la expresión de esta proteína está alterada en los casos de cáncer de paratiroides, lo que serviría como método de diagnóstico por inmunohistoquímica, con una sensibilidad y especificidad de 73-96 por ciento y 99-100 por ciento, respectivamente. Material y Método: Se realizó tinción inmunohistoquímica anti parafibromina en 23 muestras de tejido paratiroideo (5 adenomas, 6 hiper-plasias, 7 normales y 5 carcinomas). Resultados: Se observa un patrón positivo fuerte en casi 100 por ciento de la patología benigna y 100 por ciento en tejido normal. En los casos de carcinoma sólo 2 de 5 tenían positividad fuerte. Conclusiones: La correlación clínico patológica no permite asociar la pérdida de tinción de parafibromina en algunos casos de cáncer inequívocos. La tinción de parafibromina no permite discriminar entre patología benigna y maligna.

Estudio de biodisponibilidad relativa entre dos formulaciones orales de micofenolato mofetilo en voluntarios sanos / Relative bioavailability study of two oral formulations of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy volunteers

Background: The bioequivalence of different formulations of a same pharmaceutical product must be tested empirically. Aim: To evaluate the relative bioavailability for an oralformulation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Linfonex™) compared to the reference formulation (Cellcept™) to determine the bioequivalence between both formulations. Material and Methods: A randomized, crossover, double-blind trial in 22 healthy male volunteers, who received a single oral dose of 1000 mg of Linfonex and Cellcept with a washout period of 10 days. Plasma levels of the drug were determined by high performance liquid chr ornatography. Plasma concentrations were plotted and maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration versus time between 0 and 12 hours after administration and área under plasma concentration curve versus time after administration between 0 and infinity, were calculated for both products. Results: The active compound, mycophenolic acid, was similarly absorbed in both formulations. No statistically significant differences were found in calculated pharmacokinetic parameters between both formulations. Conclusions: Linfonex™ 500 mg is bioequivalent to Cellcept™ 500 mg.